While our “leaders” in Washington and across much of corporate America have earned a torrent of disdain for what they have done and failed to do, given that such would produce little good, let me suggest as we wait to come out of this health crisis, we begin to look across the valley and set our sights on how to rebuild our economy. While politicians in Washington franticly enact one short term stimulus package after another, strategic investments should be funded to not only stimulate the economy in the short term but provide long term benefits for generations to come.
Continue reading “STRATEGIC INVESTING FOR A SUSTAINABLE RECOVERY”COMPASSION IN GOVERNANCE?
I’ve never been one of the sharper pencils in the box, but something that has perplexed me over the last three years is the support so many friends and colleagues have extended to Donald Trump and his policies. The Trump supporters I speak of are intelligent people of good will, whom I respect. And yet, one question continually confounds me: If you saw a man abusing women and children or an elderly person somewhere in public, would you not step in and do your utmost to stop it? I’m confident everyone I know would. And yet, for reasons apparently beyond me, people continue to support Trump despite a wealth of speech and conduct that runs counter to the values they espouse, and clear evidence that he drives policies that hurt millions of innocent people. Here are a few examples for your consideration.
Continue reading “COMPASSION IN GOVERNANCE?”WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE A REPUBLICAN?
As a Republican of 40 years, it is not only painful and deeply troubling to witness how dramatically divisions have cut into the fabric of our country, but how fellow moderate, pragmatic Republicans have caved in to the ideological hard-right. Given what has become an all too common tendency among so many of us to stridently lurch to support or denigrate Trump, perhaps it would be worthwhile to take a step back and ask ourselves: “What does it mean to be a Republican?” What are the core values we stand for, and let those values guide our judgments, words and votes on the policies and people leading us.
Continue reading “WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE A REPUBLICAN?”EXPLORING WASTE-TO-ENERGY SOLUTIONS
Speech before Sustainability Seminar at University of Mount Union:
Good evening ladies and gentlemen and welcome to our 2nd Sustainability Seminar. This seminar focuses on Energy Efficiency and Waste-to-Energy Solutions. Tonight we have three top speakers, who will not only discuss their success stories in the areas of reducing energy consumption and waste-to-energy solutions, but will dispel the common misconception that reducing greenhouse gas emissions increases costs. Quite to the contrary, I think you’ll find time and again, that reducing energy consumption and costs, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions go hand and hand. I and the other speakers are not so naïve as to suggest that you do what is not in your economic best interests. Irrespective of what you believe or don’t believe about global warming, I submit to you that opportunities abound to reduce energy consumption and costs, and companies that focus and capitalize on those opportunities will enhance their competitive advantage and sustain improved short and long term profitability.
IRAN, THE ECONOMY AND GLOBAL WARMING
If America and Americans want to contain the influence of Iran, improve the health of our economy, and retard growth in global warming, we have at hand a silver bullet that can simultaneously accomplish all three: reduce fuel consumption, particularly gasoline. With a few minor adjustments to our driving habits, we can put more pressure on the Iranian government than another aircraft carrier battle group, we can reduce our burgeoning trade deficit and the upward pressure it exerts on interest rates, and we can turn the corner on reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
ENERGY PARADIGM SHIFT ESSENTIAL
While most Americans struggle with high gas prices at the pump, and worry about what it will cost to heat their homes this winter, America seems to be going nowhere fast in addressing its energy problems. Unfortunately, a number of political leaders are advocating increasing refining capacity, giving out billions in home heating subsidies and creating a mileage tax. While these solutions may seem helpful, they’re headed in the wrong direction because they focus on maintaining consumption or constraining transportation. A paradigm shift which focuses on significantly incentifying the conservation of energy is essential to addressing America’s energy, economic and environmental challenges. Incrementally increasing energy supplies, while generally helpful, will be consumed by our growing economy and will not reduce America’s massive oil import needs. If Washington, as well as the states, would raise taxes on energy, particularly gasoline, and offset that with a decrease in individual and corporate income taxes, Americans would be no worse off in terms of total taxes, but we would all have a strong incentive to further reduce energy consumption. Our tradition in America of taxing income in effect restrains growth. What we really need to restrain is the consumption of energy which significantly contributes to pollution, global warming, and our nation’s growing trade deficit. Clearly, if ever there were an example of an appropriate use of tax policy to promote national goals, increasing taxes on energy consumption would be it.
REDUCE AMERICA’S OIL DEPENDENCE NOW
While our leaders in Washington seem to believe there’s little they can do to reduce America’s dependence on foreign oil in the short term, there are in fact a number of things they can do, but it will require some creativity and a healthy dose of political courage.
TAX OIL, NOT WORK
While our leaders in Washington seem to believe there’s little they can do to reduce America’s dependence on foreign oil in the short term, there are in fact a number of things they can do, but it will require some creativity and a healthy dose of political courage. For example, if the President Bush and Congress would raise taxes on gasoline, and offset that tax increase with a decrease in income taxes, American’s would be no worse off in terms of their total tax bills, but we would have some pretty strong incentive to reduce our consumption of fuel. If those taxes were scheduled to gradually increase every year, perhaps by 5% per year, while also reducing income taxes by an equivalent amount, Americans and American businesses would have the incentive and a vision for their need to reduce fuel and energy consumption. Our leaders in Washington suggest that technology and increasing domestic supplies of energy are the key to energy independence. However, real reductions in America’s energy dependency, as well, as reducing pollution and global warming, are tied to reducing our consumption of energy, particularly fuel for cars and trucks.